Why Do Infill Walls Matter in Seismic Design?
In India, most multi-storey RC frame buildings have their structural bays filled with unreinforced masonry (URM) walls — made of brick or block masonry. During an earthquake, these walls do not just sit passively inside the frame; they interact with the surrounding RC columns and beams, fundamentally changing the building's stiffness, strength, and seismic behaviour.
For decades, structural engineers conservatively ignored infill walls in analysis (treating buildings as "bare frames"). IS 1893:2016 now mandates that you account for their in-plane stiffness and strength, especially in Seismic Zones III, IV, and V.
- ❌ Leads to soft-storey irregularity when one storey has fewer infills (e.g., ground floor parking)
- ❌ Underestimates building stiffness → incorrect natural period
- ❌ Incorrect distribution of seismic forces between floors
- ❌ Columns attract unexpected shear forces ("short column" effect)
- ✅ Model each URM infill as an equivalent diagonal strut
- ✅ Analyse both bare frame and infilled frame
- ✅ Design RC members for governing combination
- ✅ Check irregularity per Table 6 for every storey
"In RC buildings with moment resisting frames and unreinforced masonry (URM) infill walls, variation of storey stiffness and storey strength shall be examined along the height of the building considering in-plane stiffness and strength of URM infill walls. If storey stiffness and strength variations render it to be irregular as per Table 6, the irregularity shall be considered especially in Seismic Zones III, IV and V."
The URM infill wall (dashed outline) is replaced by a diagonal compression strut (shaded band) of width w and thickness t. Ends are pin-jointed to the RC frame.
The Equivalent Diagonal Strut Formulas
If you don't have direct test data for the masonry prism strength fm, calculate it from individual brick and mortar strengths:
| Symbol | Meaning | Typical Range |
|---|---|---|
| fm | Masonry prism compressive strength | 2 – 10 MPa |
| fb | Brick unit compressive strength | 3.5 – 25 MPa (IS 1077) |
| fmo | Mortar compressive strength | 2.5 – 10 MPa |
| Em | Modulus of elasticity of masonry | 1100 – 5500 MPa |
This dimensionless parameter captures the relative stiffness between the masonry infill and the surrounding RC frame columns. It is the core of the method.
| Symbol | Meaning | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| h | Clear height of URM infill between top beam soffit and bottom slab top | mm |
| l | Clear length of URM infill between faces of vertical RC elements (columns) | mm |
| t | Thickness of infill wall (same as strut thickness) | mm |
| θ | Angle of diagonal strut with horizontal = arctan(h/l) | degrees |
| Em | Modulus of elasticity of masonry (= 550 fm) | MPa |
| Ec | Modulus of elasticity of RC frame material (concrete) | MPa |
| Ic | Moment of inertia of the adjoining column cross-section (about bending axis) | mm⁴ |
| L | Diagonal length of strut = √(h² + l²) | mm |
This is the main formula of Clause 7.9.2.2. Once αh is known, the strut width is calculated as:
h/l < 12 and l/t < 12-
Pin-jointed connections
The ends of the diagonal strut shall be pin-jointed to the RC frame nodes (beam-column junctions). No moment is transferred — the strut is purely axial.
-
Assign cross-section
Create a rectangular section: width = w (calculated), depth = t (infill thickness). Assign material as masonry with E = Em.
-
Compression only
Masonry cannot take tension. The diagonal strut should be defined as a compression-only member (tension stiffness = 0). Under reversed loading, the opposite diagonal activates.
-
Two struts per panel
In practice, for dynamic (bidirectional) analysis, both diagonal struts may be modelled simultaneously to capture both directions of loading.
-
Two analyses required (Cl. 7.9.1.1)
Analyse (a) the bare frame and (b) the frame with URM infills. RC members shall be designed for the governing combination of stress resultants from both analyses.
Step-by-Step Solved Problem
📝 Problem Statement
A typical bay of a G+4 RC MRF building has an infill wall panel with the following data. Determine the equivalent diagonal strut dimensions as per IS 1893:2016 Cl. 7.9.2.2.
| Clear height of infill (h) | 3000 mm |
| Clear length of infill (l) | 4500 mm |
| Thickness of infill wall (t) | 230 mm |
| Brick compressive strength (fb) | 10 MPa |
| Mortar compressive strength (fmo) | 7.5 MPa |
| Concrete grade of RC frame | M25 (Ec = 25000 MPa) |
| Column cross-section (b × d) | 350 mm × 450 mm |
| Bending axis of column | About 350 mm dimension (strong axis) |
Substituting values:
Final Summary
| Parameter | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| fm (Masonry prism strength) | 4.02 | MPa |
| Em (Masonry modulus) | 2211 | MPa |
| θ (Strut angle) | 33.69 | degrees |
| L (Diagonal length) | 5408.3 | mm |
| αh (Relative stiffness) | 4.86 | — |
| w (Strut width) | 502.6 | mm |
| t (Strut thickness) | 230 | mm |
Diagonal Strut Width Calculator
Enter your infill wall and frame parameters below. All calculations follow IS 1893 (Part 1):2016, Clauses 7.9.2.1 and 7.9.2.2.
Equivalent Diagonal Strut — IS 1893:2016
Cl. 7.9.2.1 + 7.9.2.2| Step | Parameter | Formula / Expression | Value |
|---|
Key Takeaways for Students
| Clause | Content |
|---|---|
| 7.9.1 | RC MRF buildings with URM infills must examine storey stiffness & strength variations. Irregularities per Table 6 must be addressed. |
| 7.9.1.1 | RC members to be designed for governing combination from (a) bare frame analysis, and (b) infilled frame analysis. |
| 7.9.2.1 | Em = 550 fm (MPa); fm = 0.433 fb⁰·⁶⁴ fmo⁰·³⁶ |
| 7.9.2.2(a) | Ends of diagonal struts shall be pin-jointed to RC frame. |
| 7.9.2.2(b) | Width w = 0.175 αh⁻⁰·⁴ L, where αh = h[(Em·t·sin2θ)/(4EcIch)]⁰·²⁵ |
| 7.9.2.2(c) | For walls with openings: no reduction in strut width required. |
| 7.9.2.2 (last para) | Strut thickness = t, provided h/l < 12 and l/t < 12. |
- Using the full frame height H instead of clear infill height h
- Using frame span L instead of clear infill length l for computing θ
- Taking Ic about the wrong axis (must be about the column axis parallel to the infill plane)
- Using diagonal length L in metres instead of mm (keep consistent units throughout)
- Forgetting that two analyses (bare frame + infilled frame) are required