IS 1893 : Part 1 : 2016 Annex F โ€” Simplified Procedure for Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential  |  Amendment No. 1, September 2017
๐Ÿ“˜ IS 1893 Part 1 : 2016 ยท Annex F

Liquefaction Assessment
Simplified Procedure
Explained Step by Step

A comprehensive, student-friendly guide to the IS 1893 Annex F simplified procedure for evaluating the liquefaction potential of soils during earthquakes โ€” covering SPT, CPT, and shear wave velocity methods.

๐Ÿ“Š Quick Reference

8Step simplified procedure (Annex F)
3In-situ test methods: SPT, CPT, Vs
1.0FS threshold โ€” below this, soil liquefies
1.2FS for minimal permanent deformation
7.5Reference earthquake magnitude (Mw)

What is Liquefaction?

Before diving into the procedure, understand the phenomenon you are evaluating.

๐Ÿ’ง

Definition

Liquefaction occurs when saturated, loosely packed sandy or silty soil temporarily loses its shear strength and behaves like a liquid during earthquake shaking. Pore water pressure rises, effective stress drops to zero.

โš ๏ธ

When Does It Occur?

Susceptible conditions: loose saturated sands/silts, shallow water table (< 10 m), earthquake magnitude Mw โ‰ฅ 5.0, and peak ground acceleration sufficient to induce cyclic shear stress.

๐Ÿ—๏ธ

Why It Matters

Liquefied ground can cause foundation failure, building settlement, lateral spreading, loss of bearing capacity, and pipeline damage. Bhuj (2001) earthquake in Gujarat caused widespread liquefaction damage.

๐Ÿ“‹

IS 1893 Requirement

Clause 6.3.5.3 of IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2016 mandates liquefaction assessment for sites in Zones III, IV, and V with saturated sandy soils. Annex F provides the simplified procedure.

๐Ÿ”ฌ

Why In-Situ Testing?

Undisturbed sampling from liquefiable sites is nearly impossible โ€” the loose sandy fabric is destroyed during sampling. IS 1893 therefore mandates in-situ tests: SPT, CPT, or shear wave velocity measurements.

๐ŸŒ

Susceptible Soils

Clean sands and silty sands (SP, SM in IS classification), Fines Content (FC) typically < 35%, Plasticity Index (PI) < 7 for silts, Relative Density Dr < 60โ€“70%, depth โ‰ค 20 m below ground.

The 8-Step Simplified Procedure at a Glance

1
Step 1 โ€” Data Collection: Water table, SPT-N or CPT-qc or Vs, Unit weight ฮณ, Fines content FC
โ†“
2
Step 2 โ€” Overburden Stresses: Compute ฯƒvโ‚€ (total) and ฯƒ'vโ‚€ (effective) at each layer depth
โ†“
3
Step 3 โ€” Stress Reduction Factor rd: Depth-dependent reduction (two-zone formula)
โ†“
4
Step 4 โ€” Calculate CSR: Cyclic Stress Ratio = 0.65 ร— (amax/g) ร— (ฯƒvโ‚€/ฯƒ'vโ‚€) ร— rd
โ†“
โš™๏ธ
Step 5 โ€” Find CRRโ‚‡.โ‚… (base) โ€” Choose Method โ†’
6(a) SPT Method
Nโ‚†โ‚€, (Nโ‚)โ‚†โ‚€, fines correction
6(b) CPT Method
qcโ‚โ‚™ normalization, Ic index
6(c) Vs Method
Vsโ‚ stress-corrected velocity
โ†“
5
Step 5 (contd.) โ€” Apply Corrections: CRR = CRRโ‚‡.โ‚… ร— MSF ร— Kฯƒ ร— Kฮฑ
โ†“
7
Step 7 โ€” Factor of Safety: FS = CRR / CSR
โ†“
8
Step 8 โ€” Decision: FS < 1.0 โ†’ Liquefaction โš ๏ธ | FS โ‰ฅ 1.2 โ†’ Minimal deformation โœ…

Step-by-Step Procedure Explained

Each step from Annex F is explained with the original IS 1893 formula, plain-language explanation, and worked examples.

1
Data Collection
Gather all subsurface information before analysis begins
โ–ผ

The IS 1893 Annex F procedure begins with assembling a complete picture of the subsurface. Without accurate field data, no analytical result is reliable.

Required Information (Clause F-1, Step 1):

  • ๐Ÿ“ Water Table Depth (dw): Location of the groundwater table โ€” critical since only saturated soils can liquefy
  • ๐Ÿ”จ SPT Blow Count (N) or CPT tip resistance (qc) or shear wave velocity (Vs) at various depths
  • โš–๏ธ Unit Weight (ฮณ): Above and below water table, for computing overburden stresses
  • ๐Ÿงช Fines Content (FC): Percentage by weight passing IS Sieve No. 75 ฮผm โ€” affects liquefaction susceptibility
  • ๐Ÿ“ Depth of interest: All potentially liquefiable layers (typically 0โ€“20 m depth)
๐Ÿ’ก Which test to use? SPT (IS 2131) is most common in India. CPT gives continuous profile. Shear wave velocity is non-invasive but less commonly used. All three methods are accepted by IS 1893.
2
Overburden Stress Calculation
ฯƒvโ‚€ (total) and ฯƒ'vโ‚€ (effective) at every depth of interest
โ–ผ

At every depth z where a liquefiable layer exists, you must compute two stresses. These are the foundation of the CSR and CRR calculations.

ฯƒv0 = ฮฃ (ฮณi ร— hi)  โ† Total vertical overburden stress (kPa) ฯƒ'v0 = ฯƒv0 โˆ’ u  โ† Effective stress = total โˆ’ pore pressure (kPa) u = ฮณw ร— (z โˆ’ dw)  โ† Pore water pressure; ฮณw = 9.81 kN/mยณ

Example: Soil profile: dry unit weight ฮณd = 18 kN/mยณ, saturated ฮณsat = 20 kN/mยณ, water table at 2 m depth.

At z = 5 m:  ฯƒvโ‚€ = 18ร—2 + 20ร—3 = 96 kPa,  u = 9.81ร—3 = 29.4 kPa,  ฯƒ'vโ‚€ = 96 โˆ’ 29.4 = 66.6 kPa

๐Ÿ“Œ Note: The ratio ฯƒvโ‚€/ฯƒ'vโ‚€ appears in the CSR formula โ€” a high water table (shallow dw) increases this ratio and therefore increases the demand CSR, making liquefaction more likely.
3
Stress Reduction Factor rd
Accounts for flexibility of the soil column under earthquake shaking
โ–ผ

A rigid soil column would transmit shear stress uniformly with depth. In reality, soils are deformable โ€” shear stress reduces with depth. The factor rd (โ‰ค 1.0) accounts for this.

rd = 1.000 โˆ’ 0.00765z   for 0 โ‰ค z โ‰ค 9.15 m rd = 1.174 โˆ’ 0.0267z   for 9.15 m < z โ‰ค 23.0 m

where z = depth below ground surface in metres

Depth z (m)rd valueReduction from 1.0
0 m1.0000%
3 m0.9772.3%
6 m0.9544.6%
9.15 m0.9307.0%
12 m0.85314.7%
15 m0.77322.7%
20 m0.64036.0%
๐Ÿ“Œ Key Insight: At the surface, rd = 1.0. At z = 9.15 m, both formulas give the same value (~0.930), ensuring continuity. For depths > 23 m, IS 1893 does not provide guidance โ€” specialist analysis is required.
4
Cyclic Stress Ratio (CSR) โ€” Seismic Demand
Quantifies the shear stress imposed by the earthquake on the soil
โ–ผ

CSR represents the seismic demand โ€” how hard the earthquake is shaking the soil. It is compared against the soil's resistance (CRR) to find the Factor of Safety.

CSR = 0.65 ร— (amax/g) ร— (ฯƒv0/ฯƒ'v0) ร— rd where: amax = Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) g = Acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/sยฒ) 0.65 = Correction for irregular earthquake shaking (โ‰ˆ 65% of peak)
๐Ÿ”‘ If PGA is not available: IS 1893 permits using the Seismic Zone Factor Z (from Table 3) as a proxy for amax/g. This is a conservative simplification.
Seismic ZoneZone Factor ZUse as amax/g
Zone II0.10Low seismicity
Zone III0.16Moderate
Zone IV0.24High
Zone V0.36Very High

Worked Example: Zone IV site (Z = 0.24), z = 6 m, ฯƒvโ‚€/ฯƒ'vโ‚€ = 1.44, rd = 0.954

CSR = 0.65 ร— 0.24 ร— 1.44 ร— 0.954 = 0.216

5
CRR Corrections โ€” MSF, Kฯƒ, Kฮฑ
Adjust the base resistance for earthquake magnitude and overburden pressure
โ–ผ

The CRRโ‚‡.โ‚… obtained from Step 6 is valid only for Mw = 7.5 earthquakes at shallow depth. Apply three corrections to get the actual CRR:

CRR = CRR7.5 ร— MSF ร— Kฯƒ ร— Kฮฑ โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” โ‘  Magnitude Scaling Factor (MSF): MSF = 102.24 / Mw2.56 โ‘ก Overburden Correction (Kฯƒ) โ€” for depth > 15 m: Kฯƒ = (ฯƒ'v/Pa)(fโˆ’1) ; Pa = 100 kPa โ‘ข Static Shear Stress Correction (Kฮฑ): Kฮฑ = 1.0 โ† For level ground (routine practice)

MSF Values by Magnitude:

MwMSFEffect on CRR
5.02.20Doubles resistance
6.01.52+52% resistance
7.01.09+9% resistance
7.51.00Reference (no change)
8.00.73โˆ’27% resistance

Kฯƒ Exponent f by Relative Density:

Relative Density Drf value
40 โ€“ 60%0.8
60 โ€“ 80%0.7
> 80%0.6
For ฯƒ'v โ‰ค 100 kPa (depth โ‰ค ~10 m), Kฯƒ โ‰ˆ 1.0. It only reduces CRR for deep/dense soils under high overburden.
6a
CRRโ‚‡.โ‚… via SPT Method
Most widely used method in Indian practice โ€” 5 sub-steps
โ–ผ

Sub-Step A: Standardize to Nโ‚†โ‚€ (60% efficiency)

N60 = N ร— CE ร— CB ร— CR ร— CS where: CE = energy efficiency factor (= 1.0 for IS 2131 donut hammer) CB = borehole diameter correction CR = rod length correction CS = sampler type correction
For SPT conducted as per IS 2131, the energy delivered is ~60% โ†’ CE = 1.0. See Table 12 for all correction factors.

Sub-Step B: Normalize to (Nโ‚)โ‚†โ‚€ at 100 kPa overburden

(N1)60 = CN ร— N60 CN = โˆš(Pa/ฯƒ'v0)  โ‰ค 1.7 ; Pa = 100 kPa (atmospheric pressure)

Sub-Step C: Correct for Fines Content to get (Nโ‚)โ‚†โ‚€cs

โš ๏ธ Amendment No. 1 (Sept 2017): For FC โ‰ฅ 35%, ฮฑ = 5 (not 0.5 as in original IS 1893:2016 print).
(N1)60cs = ฮฑ + ฮฒ ร— (N1)60

FC โ‰ค 5% (Clean Sand)

ฮฑ = 0
ฮฒ = 1.0
(Nโ‚)โ‚†โ‚€cs = (Nโ‚)โ‚†โ‚€

5% < FC < 35%

ฮฑ = exp(1.76 โˆ’ 190/FCยฒ)
ฮฒ = 0.99 + FC1.5/1000
Interpolated values

FC โ‰ฅ 35% (Silty/Clayey)

ฮฑ = 5 (Amended)
ฮฒ = 1.2
(Nโ‚)โ‚†โ‚€cs = 5 + 1.2ร—(Nโ‚)โ‚†โ‚€

Sub-Step D: Calculate CRRโ‚‡.โ‚… from (Nโ‚)โ‚†โ‚€cs

CRR7.5 = (Nโ‚)60cs / (34 โˆ’ (Nโ‚)60cs) + (Nโ‚)60cs / 135 + 50 / [10(Nโ‚)60cs + 45]ยฒ โˆ’ 1/200 Valid for (Nโ‚)โ‚†โ‚€cs โ‰ค 30. For (Nโ‚)โ‚†โ‚€cs > 30 โ†’ no liquefaction (dense soil)

Example: (Nโ‚)โ‚†โ‚€cs = 15 โ†’ CRRโ‚‡.โ‚… = 15/(34โˆ’15) + 15/135 + 50/[10ร—15+45]ยฒ โˆ’ 1/200

= 0.789 + 0.111 + 50/[195]ยฒ โˆ’ 0.005 = 0.789 + 0.111 + 0.00131 โˆ’ 0.005 = 0.897 โ†’ but check with chart

(Note: Use the equation or Fig. 8 from IS 1893 โ€” the Clean Sand Base Curve)

6b
CRRโ‚‡.โ‚… via CPT Method
Continuous profile โ€” normalized cone tip resistance approach
โ–ผ

The CPT method normalizes cone tip resistance qc and corrects for soil behavior type using the Soil Behavior Type Index Ic.

Step 1: Normalize qc to get qc1n

qc1n = Cq ร— (qc/Pa) Cq = (Pa/ฯƒ'v0)n n = 0.5 for sand, 1.0 for clay

Step 2: Soil Behavior Type Index Ic

Ic = โˆš[(3.47 โˆ’ log Q)ยฒ + (1.22 + log F)ยฒ] F = 100 ร— fs/(qc โˆ’ ฯƒv0) % (friction ratio) Ic < 1.64 โ†’ Sand-like behavior Ic โ‰ฅ 1.64 โ†’ Silt/Clay-like behavior

Step 3: Apply grain characteristic correction kc

kc = 1.0 for Ic โ‰ค 1.64 kc = โˆ’0.403Icโด + 5.581Icยณ โˆ’ 21.63Icยฒ + 33.75Ic โˆ’ 17.88 for Ic > 1.64 (qc1n)cs = kc ร— qc1n

Step 4: Find CRRโ‚‡.โ‚… from (qc1n)cs

CRR7.5 = 0.833 ร— (qc1n)cs/1000 + 0.05 for 0 โ‰ค (qc1n)cs < 50 CRR7.5 = 93 ร— [(qc1n)cs/1000]ยณ + 0.08 for 50 โ‰ค (qc1n)cs < 160
6c
CRRโ‚‡.โ‚… via Shear Wave Velocity Method
Non-invasive in-situ method using Vs measurements
โ–ผ

The shear wave velocity Vs measured in the field is first corrected for overburden stress, then used directly to estimate CRRโ‚‡.โ‚….

Step 1: Overburden-corrected shear wave velocity Vs1

Vs1 = (Pa/ฯƒ'v0)0.25 ร— Vs

Step 2: Calculate CRRโ‚‡.โ‚… using Vs1

CRR7.5 = a ร— (Vs1/V*s1)ยฒ + b ร— [1/(V*s1โˆ’Vs1) โˆ’ 1/V*s1] Curve fitting constants from IS 1893: a = 0.022, b = 2.8 V*s1 = limiting upper value of Vs1 (linear interpolation): Fines Content โ‰ค 5%: V*s1 = 215 m/s Fines Content = 35%: V*s1 = 200 m/s
7
Factor of Safety Against Liquefaction
The final check โ€” compare demand vs. capacity
โ–ผ
FS = CRR / CSR
FS ValueInterpretationAction
FS < 1.0Liquefaction occursGround improvement mandatory
1.0 โ‰ค FS < 1.2Marginal โ€” some deformationDetailed analysis recommended
FS โ‰ฅ 1.2Safe โ€” minimal permanent deformationGenerally acceptable
๐Ÿ“Œ IS 1893 Clause: When design ground motion is conservative, earthquake-related permanent ground deformation is generally small if FS โ‰ฅ 1.2. However, FS = 1.0 is the primary threshold for liquefaction.
8
Decision and Remediation
Final verdict and next steps if liquefaction is predicted
โ–ผ

IS 1893 Clause F-1, Step 8: If FS < 1.0, the soil is assumed to liquefy.

If liquefaction is predicted:

  • Densification (vibro-compaction, dynamic compaction)
  • Stone columns / vibro-replacement
  • Deep foundations bypassing liquefiable layer
  • Dewatering (lower water table)
  • Grouting / cementation
  • Soil replacement

Post-liquefaction effects to check:

  • Settlement of structures (bearing capacity loss)
  • Lateral spreading on sloped or waterfront sites
  • Sand boils and ground surface disruption
  • Flotation of buried structures
  • Pipeline damage from lateral movement
Repeat for Each Layer: Steps 2โ€“8 must be performed for every potentially liquefiable layer in the soil profile. The critical layer (lowest FS) governs design.

Liquefaction Potential Calculator

Enter your site and soil data to compute CSR, CRR, and Factor of Safety using the IS 1893 Annex F simplified procedure.

Site Geometry
Stress Inputs
Seismic Parameters
SPT Data
Overburden Correction (Kฯƒ)

Results

๐Ÿงฎ

Fill in the inputs and click Calculate
to see results here

Site & Seismic Data
CPT Measurements

CPT Results

๐Ÿ“Š

Fill in CPT inputs and click Calculate

Site & Seismic Data
Shear Wave Velocity

Vs Method Results

๐Ÿ”Š

Fill in Vs inputs and click Calculate

Standard Equipment & Correction Factors

Reproduced from IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2016, Annex F (Clause F-1, Step 6a) for quick reference.

Table 11

Recommended Standardized SPT Equipment (IS 2131)

Clause F-1, Step 6(a)

No.ElementStandard Specification
iSamplerStandard split-spoon sampler: OD = 51 mm, ID = 35 mm (no room for liners)
iiDrill RodsA or AW type for depths < 15.2 m; N or NW type for greater depths
iiiHammerStandard (safety) hammer: weight = 63.5 kg, drop height = 762 mm (76.2 cm)
ivRopeTwo wraps of rope around the pulley
vBorehole100โ€“130 mm diameter rotary borehole with bentonite mud for stability (hollow stem augers where SPT taken through stem)
viDrill BitUpward deflection of drilling mud (tricone or baffled drag bit)
viiBlow Count Rate30 to 40 blows per minute
viiiPenetration Resistance CountMeasured over range of 150 mm to 450 mm of penetration into the ground
Table 12

Correction Factors for Non-Standard SPT Equipment

Clause F-1, Step 6(a) โ€” For computing Nโ‚†โ‚€ from measured N

No.Correction ForCorrection Factor Values
i Non-standard hammer (rope-and-pulley) CE = 0.75 (Donut hammer with rope & pulley)
CE = 1.35 (Donut hammer with trip auto)
ii Non-standard hammer weight / drop height CE = โˆš(W ร— H / (63.5 ร— 762)) where H = height of fall (mm), W = weight (kg)
iii Non-standard sampler (with liners, but not used) CS = 1.1 (loose sand), CS = 1.2 (dense sand)
iv Non-standard sampler (with liners, liners used) CS = 0.9 (loose sand), CS = 0.7 (dense sand)
v Rod length correction CR 0โ€“3 m: 0.75 | 3โ€“4 m: 0.85 | 4โ€“6 m: 0.95 | 6โ€“10 m: 1.00 | >10 m: 1.00
vi Borehole diameter CB 65โ€“115 mm: 1.00 | 150 mm: 1.05 | 200 mm: 1.15
Notes:
1. N = Uncorrected SPT blow count
2. Cฮท = CHT ร— CHV ร— CSS ร— CRL ร— CBD
3. N60 = N ร— Cฮท
4. CN = Overburden correction factor;   (Nโ‚)โ‚†โ‚€ = CN ร— N60
5. For IS 2131 equipment: energy ~60% โ†’ CE = 1.0 (no correction needed)

โš ๏ธ Amendment No. 1 โ€” September 2017

IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2016 was amended in September 2017. The key change affecting liquefaction calculation:

[Page 39, Annex F, Clause F-1, Step 6(a)] โ€” In para 4 under step (a),
substitute ฮฑ = 5 for ฮฑ = 0.5 (for FC โ‰ฅ 35%)

This significantly increases (Nโ‚)โ‚†โ‚€cs for silty soils with high fines content. Always use the amended value ฮฑ = 5 in all calculations.

Key Takeaways

Critical points from IS 1893 Annex F that every engineer must remember.

๐Ÿ’ง

Saturation is Prerequisite

Only saturated soils can liquefy. Depth > water table is not analyzed. Effective stress ฯƒ'vโ‚€ must be positive for liquefaction to occur.

โš–๏ธ

CSR = Demand; CRR = Capacity

CSR comes from the earthquake (seismic input). CRR comes from the soil (field test data). FS = CRR/CSR โ€” same logic as a structural load/resistance ratio.

๐Ÿ”ง

(Nโ‚)โ‚†โ‚€cs โ‰ฅ 30 โ†’ No Liquefaction

If the fines-corrected, overburden-normalized blow count exceeds 30, the soil is considered too dense to liquefy. No further calculation needed.

๐Ÿ“

MSF Adjusts for Magnitude

MSF > 1.0 for Mw < 7.5 (increases CRR โ†’ more resistant). MSF < 1.0 for Mw > 7.5 (decreases CRR โ†’ more vulnerable). Always check the magnitude.

โš ๏ธ

Amendment: ฮฑ = 5 (not 0.5) for FC โ‰ฅ 35%

Always use the September 2017 Amendment No. 1 value. The original IS 1893:2016 print contained a typographic error (ฮฑ = 0.5 instead of ฮฑ = 5).

๐ŸŒŠ

Zones III, IV, V are Priority

IS 1893 mandates liquefaction assessment particularly for high-seismicity zones. Zone II sites with special conditions may also require assessment.

๐Ÿ“

Kฯƒ Only Relevant at Depth

For depths โ‰ค 15 m with ฯƒ'vโ‚€ โ‰ค 100 kPa, Kฯƒ โ‰ˆ 1.0 and can be ignored. It only reduces CRR meaningfully for deep, dense layers under high overburden.

๐Ÿ”„

Repeat for Every Liquefiable Layer

The analysis must be performed for each potentially liquefiable layer independently. Report the minimum FS across all layers โ€” that governs the design.

Generate Project Report

Capture all calculated KPIs and generate a print-ready project submission report based on your calculator inputs.

๐Ÿ“‹ Liquefaction Assessment Report Generator

IS 1893 (Part 1) : 2016, Annex F โ€” Simplified Procedure

โšก The report will pull values from the SPT Calculator. Run the SPT calculation first, then generate the report.